Na pomlouv\u00e1n\u00ed ostatn\u00edch bezpochyby nen\u00ed nic chv\u00e1lyhodn\u00e9ho. Je ale t\u0159eba rozli\u0161ovat, co je \u201epouze\u201c nemor\u00e1ln\u00ed, a co lze pova\u017eovat za protipr\u00e1vn\u00ed jedn\u00e1n\u00ed, \u010di dokonce trestn\u00fd \u010din. Nav\u00edc se m\u016f\u017ee li\u0161it p\u0159\u00edpad od p\u0159\u00edpadu a n\u011bkter\u00e9 osoby by m\u011bly sn\u00e1\u0161et zv\u00fd\u0161enou m\u00edru kritiky. K tomuto z\u00e1v\u011bru dosp\u011bl ve sv\u00e9m lednov\u00e9m n\u00e1lezu \u00dastavn\u00ed soud.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Celou kauzu odstartovala pom\u011brn\u011b b\u011b\u017en\u00e1 a ban\u00e1ln\u00ed situace, kter\u00fdch se denn\u011b na ulici stanou des\u00edtky. Jist\u00e1 policistka vy\u0161et\u0159ovala drobnou dopravn\u00ed nehodu a jej\u00ed \u00fa\u010dastnice a pachatelka v jedn\u00e9 osob\u011b nebyla s pr\u016fb\u011bhem vy\u0161et\u0159ov\u00e1n\u00ed spokojen\u00e1.<\/strong> A\u017e potud je v\u0161e celkem pochopiteln\u00e9. \u017dena ale nez\u016fstala pouze u sv\u00e9 nespokojenosti a za\u010dala chov\u00e1n\u00ed vy\u0161et\u0159uj\u00edc\u00ed policistky ost\u0159e kritizovat a informovat jej\u00ed nad\u0159\u00edzen\u00e9 org\u00e1ny.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Podle \u0159idi\u010d\u010din\u00fdch slov se policistka chovala arogantn\u011b a neprofesion\u00e1ln\u011b.<\/strong> M\u00edsto korektn\u00edho postupu se \u00fadajn\u011b \u017een\u011b vysm\u00edvala, \u017ee si zaplat\u00ed vy\u0161\u0161\u00ed pokutu, a nav\u00edc se na m\u00edst\u011b nehody pot\u00e1cela, pohybovala t\u011bkav\u00fdm zp\u016fsobem a kou\u0159ila cigarety, a to i p\u0159i po\u0159izov\u00e1n\u00ed d\u016fkaz\u016f. \u017d\u00e1dn\u00e1 z tvrzen\u00fdch skute\u010dnost\u00ed se ale pozd\u011bji neprok\u00e1zala, a bylo tedy jasn\u00e9, \u017ee \u017eena lhala.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Policistka si necht\u011bla nechat takov\u00e9 jedn\u00e1n\u00ed l\u00edbit, a proto na \u017eenu podala trestn\u00ed ozn\u00e1men\u00ed<\/a>. P\u0159\u00edslu\u0161n\u00fd okresn\u00ed soud vyhodnotil, \u017ee skutek byl patrn\u011b sp\u00e1ch\u00e1n, nicm\u00e9n\u011b nen\u00ed trestn\u00fdm \u010dinem<\/a><\/strong> a m\u011bla by se j\u00edm zab\u00fdvat p\u0159estupkov\u00e1 komise. Je toti\u017e t\u0159eba rozli\u0161ovat, kdy intenzita jedn\u00e1n\u00ed p\u0159es\u00e1hne jistou m\u00edru a dojde tak k napln\u011bn\u00ed znak\u016f skutkov\u00e9 podstaty trestn\u00e9ho \u010dinu pomluvy. P\u0159edev\u0161\u00edm tedy, kdy\u017e pomluva m\u016f\u017ee zp\u016fsobit pomlouvan\u00e9 osob\u011b v\u00e1\u017enou \u00fajmu \u010di ji jinak ohrozit.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Krajsk\u00fd soud m\u011bl ale na celou v\u011bc n\u00e1zor opa\u010dn\u00fd. Rozhodnut\u00ed okresn\u00edho soudu zru\u0161il a ulo\u017eil mu, aby o v\u011bci znovu jednal. N\u00e1sledn\u011b tedy okresn\u00ed soud sv\u016fj p\u0159\u00edstup pozm\u011bnil a \u0159idi\u010dku uznal vinnou z p\u0159e\u010dinu pomluvy.<\/p>\n\n\n\n P\u0159\u00edpad postupoval op\u011btovn\u00fdmi soudn\u00edmi peripetiemi, kdy n\u00e1sledovalo dal\u0161\u00ed rozhodov\u00e1n\u00ed krajsk\u00e9ho soudu, v\u011bc se dostala a\u017e p\u0159ed Nejvy\u0161\u0161\u00ed soud a pak znovu k soudu krajsk\u00e9mu.\u00a0Ten fin\u00e1ln\u011b za pokra\u010duj\u00edc\u00ed p\u0159e\u010din pomluvy ulo\u017eil \u017een\u011b\u00a0trest odn\u011bt\u00ed svobody<\/a>\u00a0v trv\u00e1n\u00ed t\u0159\u00ed m\u011bs\u00edc\u016f, jeho\u017e v\u00fdkon podm\u00edn\u011bn\u011b odlo\u017eil na zku\u0161ebn\u00ed dobu v trv\u00e1n\u00ed dvan\u00e1cti m\u011bs\u00edc\u016f.<\/strong>\u00a0Nejvy\u0161\u0161\u00ed soud<\/a>\u00a0ji\u017e napodruh\u00e9 v dan\u00e9 v\u011bci rozhodovat necht\u011bl, nebo\u0165 op\u011btovn\u00e9 dovol\u00e1n\u00ed vyhodnotil jako neopodstatn\u00e9. Dal\u0161\u00edm procesn\u00edm \u00fakonem tedy byla \u00fastavn\u00ed st\u00ed\u017enost.<\/p>\n\n\n\n \u00dastavn\u00ed soud se znovu zab\u00fdval t\u00edm, zda pomluva dosahovala takov\u00e9 inteznzity, aby pro ni mohla b\u00fdt \u0159idi\u010dka trestn\u011b st\u00edh\u00e1na.<\/strong> Podle n\u011bj by se m\u011blo kriminalizovat jen nejz\u00e1va\u017en\u011bj\u0161\u00ed jedn\u00e1n\u00ed a z\u00e1sah do osobnostn\u00edch pr\u00e1v. Realitou toti\u017e je, \u017ee pomlouv\u00e1n\u00ed je pom\u011brn\u011b b\u011b\u017en\u00e9 jedn\u00e1n\u00ed v r\u00e1mci populace a nelze v\u0161echny pomlouvaj\u00edc\u00ed zav\u00edrat do v\u011bzen\u00ed<\/strong>. M\u011bly by se tedy odli\u0161it takov\u00e9 v\u00fdjime\u010dn\u00e9 p\u0159\u00edpady, kdy doch\u00e1z\u00ed k nejz\u00e1va\u017en\u011bj\u0161\u00edm jedn\u00e1n\u00edm a z\u00e1sah\u016fm do osobnostn\u00edch pr\u00e1v (cti a dobr\u00e9 pov\u011bsti jednotlivce), kter\u00e9 nelze pln\u011b zhojit soukromopr\u00e1vn\u00edmi prost\u0159edky jako je \u017ealoba na ochranu osobnosti. Kriminalizovan\u00e9 p\u0159\u00edpady by m\u011bly z\u0159eteln\u011b p\u0159esahovat m\u00edru \u201eb\u011b\u017en\u00fdch\u201c l\u017e\u00ed a nepravd, kter\u00e9 o sob\u011b lid\u00e9 \u0161\u00ed\u0159\u00ed v b\u011b\u017en\u00e9m \u017eivot\u011b.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Podstatn\u00e9 pro posouzen\u00ed \u00dastavn\u00edm soudem byla skute\u010dnost, \u017ee po\u0161kozen\u00e1 policistka byla v postaven\u00ed \u00fa\u0159edn\u00ed osoby. Nav\u00edc k pomluv\u011b nedo\u0161lo ve\u0159ejnou cestou<\/strong> (nap\u0159\u00edklad sd\u011blen\u00edm novin\u00e1m apod.) \u0158idi\u010dka svou smy\u0161lenou st\u00ed\u017enost zaslala \u201cpouze\u201d nad\u0159\u00edzen\u00fdm policejn\u00edm org\u00e1n\u016fm. Ke sd\u011blen\u00ed nepravdiv\u00fdch informac\u00ed tak do\u0161lo neve\u0159ejn\u011b a mohla zas\u00e1hnout pouze do pracovn\u00ed sf\u00e9ry policistky.<\/strong> Pr\u00e1v\u011b tyto skute\u010dnosti byly kl\u00ed\u010dov\u00e9\u00a8.<\/p>\n\n\n\n \u00dastavn\u00ed soud<\/a> jedn\u00e1n\u00ed pachatelky nijak nezleh\u010doval ani neomlouval. Zd\u016fraznil ov\u0161em, \u017ee na z\u00e1sah do osobnosti po\u0161kozen\u00fdch osob, ohro\u017een\u00ed dobr\u00e9 pov\u011bsti a cti pom\u00fd\u0161l\u00ed ve sv\u00fdch ustanoven\u00edch ob\u010dansk\u00fd z\u00e1kon\u00edk<\/a>. \u0158ada podobn\u00fdch jedn\u00e1n\u00ed je posti\u017eiteln\u00fd spr\u00e1vn\u00edmi org\u00e1ny v r\u00e1mci p\u0159estupkov\u00e9ho \u0159\u00edzen\u00ed<\/a>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Svou v\u00e1hu m\u011blo i to, \u017ee jedn\u00e1n\u00ed (pomluva) \u0159idi\u010dky nebylo dlouhodob\u00e9<\/strong>. Ne\u0161lo o systematickou s\u00ed\u0165 pomluv, ale myln\u00e9 vyhodnocen\u00ed situace, z n\u011bho\u017e vy\u0161lo n\u011bkolik obdobn\u00fdch pod\u00e1n\u00ed. V nich \u017eena poukazovala na jedn\u00e1n\u00ed \u010dlena bezpe\u010dnostn\u00edho sboru, kter\u00fd podle jej\u00edho subjektivn\u00edho vn\u00edm\u00e1n\u00ed postupoval ve slu\u017eb\u011b v rozporu s jej\u00edm o\u010dek\u00e1v\u00e1n\u00edm. \u00dastavn\u00ed soud nezpochyb\u0148oval z\u00e1v\u011bry p\u0159edchoz\u00edch soud\u016f v tom smyslu, \u017ee by se s \u017eenin\u00fdm tvrzen\u00edm ztoto\u017enil.<\/strong> V tom tedy jej\u00ed \u201cv\u00fdhra\u201d nespo\u010d\u00edv\u00e1. Naznal ale, \u017ee soudy poru\u0161ily pr\u00e1vo st\u011b\u017eovatelky na soudn\u00ed ochranu, pr\u00e1vo vypl\u00fdvaj\u00edc\u00ed ze z\u00e1sady nullum crimen sine lege<\/em> (nen\u00ed trestn\u00e9ho \u010dinu bez z\u00e1kona) a v t\u00e9to souvislosti i jej\u00ed pr\u00e1vo na svobodu projevu.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Celou kauzou se budou znovu zab\u00fdvat trestn\u00ed soudy, kter\u00e9 budou v\u00e1z\u00e1ny rozhodnut\u00edm \u00dastavn\u00edho soudu.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Rozhodl soud ve v\u00e1\u0161 neprosp\u011bch a chcete se proti tomu br\u00e1nit? Posoud\u00edme va\u0161e \u0161ance na \u00fasp\u011bch a postar\u00e1me se o p\u0159\u00edpravu odvol\u00e1n\u00ed, dovol\u00e1n\u00ed \u010di \u00fastavn\u00ed st\u00ed\u017enosti podle toho, o jak\u00e9 \u0159\u00edzen\u00ed jde a v jak\u00e9 f\u00e1zi se nach\u00e1z\u00ed.<\/p>\n\n\n\n 990 K\u010d<\/strong>v\u010detn\u011b DPH<\/p>\n\n\n\n Objednat<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n Opravn\u00fd prost\u0159edek je t\u0159eba zvolit v z\u00e1vislosti na tom, v jak\u00e9 f\u00e1zi se va\u0161e soudn\u00ed \u0159\u00edzen\u00ed nach\u00e1z\u00ed:<\/p>\n\n\n\n Na pomlouv\u00e1n\u00ed ostatn\u00edch bezpochyby nen\u00ed nic chv\u00e1lyhodn\u00e9ho. Je ale t\u0159eba rozli\u0161ovat, co je \u201epouze\u201c nemor\u00e1ln\u00ed, a co lze pova\u017eovat za protipr\u00e1vn\u00ed jedn\u00e1n\u00ed, \u010di dokonce trestn\u00fd […]<\/a><\/p>\n<\/div>","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":14537,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[7],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-46311","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-spolecnost"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.invarena.cz\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/46311","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.invarena.cz\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.invarena.cz\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.invarena.cz\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.invarena.cz\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=46311"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.invarena.cz\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/46311\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.invarena.cz\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/14537"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.invarena.cz\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=46311"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.invarena.cz\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=46311"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.invarena.cz\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=46311"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}\n
\n